Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Mon
Sep 29 2008

McLaren goes tactical

Alan Henry

Lewis Hamilton’s measured run to third place in Sunday’s superb inaugural Singapore Grand Prix night race reflected a sea change in the tactics deployed by the McLaren-Mercedes squad - and an approach which will be maintained throughout the remaining three races of the year in Japan, China and Brazil.

Lewis Singapore Hitherto McLaren’s abiding philosophy has been that winning all – or most – of the races will land the championship crown.

And, if it didn’t, then the team could not be blamed for failing to give it their very best shot.

Now, according to Martin Whitmarsh, the McLaren’s chief operating officer, things are going to be different.  On reflection the team now believes it adopted too aggressive a strategy during its 2007 campaign, this becoming a weakness which compromised its prospects of taking the title.

From now on, the team is determined to take the strategic view in its quest to put the championship title mathematically beyond reach as quickly as possible, even if that means not going for a win in every race.

“I think an inherent weakness in the team and Lewis last year was the overwhelming desire to win the race at almost any risk,” said Whitmarsh in Singapore. “And in truth that is more forgivable in Lewis. You would like to have that in a young racing driver.”

Seen as such, Hamilton’s third place in Singapore is a victory for the new corporate philosophy: “we didn't win but came away from here with more points than we thought but if you scout around you will not see the euphoria that we ought to have given the actual results. At the end of the day, another Grand Prix win is a great thing to have but we have just got to start piling the point against our biggest competitor.”

If Lewis can deploy this strategy to clinch the championship then the end will have justified the means.  Certainly, Lewis has the upper hand after the Singapore race and Massa, licking his wounds after another Ferrari refuelling fiasco, is on the back foot now.

 

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

ordinary bloke September 29, 2008 11:18 AM

This was one of the more exciting races of the season although it did look a bit odd on TV with the cars racing along between walls and high fences.

I'm just waiting now for the FIA to come up with a reason to award the win to Massa for some really obscure reason..................

Acker September 29, 2008 1:15 PM

I thought McLaren were very sensible in their methods. After all, that engine has to last through the next race so why take risks?

dillonsamben September 29, 2008 6:17 PM

An excellent race and an excellent result…………… BUT

The cynic in me asks, will there be any other penalty for the potentially lethal incident in the Ferrari pit when refuelling Massa.  If the FIA don’t take any further action against Ferrari then it says it all to those who doubt if all the teams are competing on an even playing field.

Also; the cynic in me would not be at all surprised if Massa wins the next GP and the Hamilton has a very mysterious engine problem that can only be traced to the FIA engine management ECU.

rony September 30, 2008 2:16 PM

This is the Hamilton you want to see wins the championship?

A "tactic" driver who spend most of the race behind two much slower cars without any attacking effort?

If he cannot win the championship without boring us with deffensive drive, if he cannot win the chamionship by driving like he showed us in GP2 and in Monaco and in Spa and in Monza - why should we care if he wins it at all?

If Hamilton wants to win the title the same way Greece football team won the previous European Cup, he is not the Hamilton I admired untill Singapore.

The Autocar F1 commentator should criticise such a boring tactic, not praise it.

Roy Twycross September 30, 2008 3:16 PM

I think Singapore was a failed experiment personally and I think the track was terrible.  I agree the FIA should be consisted in awarding penalties and should have fined Ferrari not given Massa a penalty.  It wasn't necessarily his fault.  Ferrari should junk their lights system and revert to a lollipop.

As for Hamilton, if he wins, I'll turn off F1 altogether.

pSynrg October 1, 2008 11:10 PM

Well, Roy Twycross - one more reason to look forward to Lewis's inevitable and incredible second season F1 title!

Sorry but you can't possibly be a an F1 fan, in my opinion of course. If you can't appreciate the raw talent of Lewis Hamilton consistently wields.

Forget about the media exposure, forget about the personality - it doesn't really matter. It's about the racer & the driver.

Lewis is not YET the most complete driver but he without a doubt the fastest we have seen since a long time. Once his race craft develops with the many inevitable ups and downs along the way. We will all be looking at a racing legend.

It's his second season in Formula 1 - just for one second put this into perspective. Not forgetting the almost total domination of a brilliant double world champion in the same machinery.

How can you have a problem with this, I do not understand?

chuckovski October 2, 2008 2:32 AM

I think the problem might be British people are so happy about Hamilton winning GPs and that's as far as they can see. There's no balance - he does everything right, and you all hate his rivals. And you never mention DC or Button. I'd like to see Hamilton in a Honda or RBR and see if he could do better.

As for your comment Rony, that Hamilton was "behind two much slower cars":

Rosberg drove exceptionally well and would have been so far in front of Hamilton that there would have been no issue. And as for Alonso - I will have to check the live timing archives, but I don't think you're correct.

He was a lot slower than Webber at Monza, but what did he do? Drive dangerously and pip him off the track during a legitimate overtaking manoeuvre. Not to mention him running Glock off the track. That was even worse. And then he said after the race what did he say? "I should have won". Of course.

pSynrg - yes, he does have great raw talents, but F1 IS about personality, because on the track that's what you show. As mentioned re: Monza, that is pure arrogance and that does not make for a good driver who is on the track with other good drivers. It's dangerous and shows that you're a sore loser. You win some, you lose some, and you accept it. That's what good drivers do. If he wins the championship it will be a sad day.

And Singapore is great. I'll be booking my flights for next year ASAP

Beowolf October 2, 2008 11:06 AM

Tactics are tactics, and if adopting the right tactics to win the championship is seen as a backdown from winning each and every race, then it's a backdown, but given the criticism they received last year for (a) letting Hamilton race on his tyres until they melted and he lost that race, and (b) letting the two drivers in their team race each other to the detriment of the championship, how can we be critical of them adopting a tactic to succeed in their end goal?

Personally, while there was drama at Singapore, it was from a racing point of view, dead dull.  If cars which were sometimes 2sec quicker than the car in front couldn't overtake, it's a silly, pointless track, whether the race is at night time or during the day.

The most exciting bit was Massa's unfortunate incident in the pitlane - Ferrari should be threatening to sack people for that one: once is a mistake, twice is stupidity - and the safety car creating an unexpected win for Alonso thanks to his strategy.  

And as for ONCE AGAIN the rules penalising was it Kubica and the other guy for pitting when they clearly had no choice and getting a 10 sec stop/go penalty, what a f*^*^*g nightmare.  I'm really sick of the rules - which are there to keep things fair - messing up the racing.  

Overall?  Dull, silly race.        

pSynrg October 3, 2008 10:32 PM

@chuckovski: I appreciate where you are coming from and totally accept that as a valid approach to racing.

However, it's not what I want from racing. I wish to see ruthless determination applied with raw natural skill.

As well as Lewis, Schuey of course springs to mind. At his peak simply the most complete F1 driver.

Yes, respect your competitors. But only to the degree that it doesn't compromise your progress.

Just the two incidents you mention (Monza, Webber, Glock) were indeed tight, aggressive, uncompromising. For me the qualities of a champion in waiting. The only thing lacking at this stage is the race craft that will come with experience.

As it is, when Lewis is racing I really don't see him doing anything other than an F1 driver should be doing in his position. And when he's ON IT he is the most fantastic driver I've ever seen in all my years of following F1 and I love it!

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Cover 07 Jan

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>