Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Fri
May 23 2008

Green, yes. Sexy? Um...

Will Powell

I'm just leaving the Sexy Green Car Show, the left-field eco motoring event that's just been held for the second year at the Eden Project in Cornwall.

Yes, there's a detectable beardy-hippy vibe going on, but nobody here is banging on about banning cars. In fact, there are some positive messages here about the future of personal transport. Most striking is the number of bright ideas aimed at reducing the car's dependency on fossil fuels.

Ford's launching its tax-beating Focus ECOnetic, and the company reckons that reducing the CO2 emissions of ever new Focus sold by just 2 per cent will do more to reduce CO2 emissions than every hybrid car on the market combined.

The company's even stuck a lovely old Ford Prefect on its stand, alongside the new Kuga. The Prefect's 30bhp engine apparently pumped out 180g/km of CO2 when it was built in 1953: excellent by the standards of the time. I'm not sure if that counts as a long-term commitment to eco-friendly motoring, but it’s here anyway.

Fiat’s 1.3-litre Multijet 500 and its 110g/km CO2 emissions has been pulling crowds – particularly when punters realise that it should be exempt from the London congestion charge. It’s hard to think of a more alluring city car on sale right now.

New stuff? There's not a huge amount of metal here, just ideas. The Liberty Range Rover we expected to have a good look at wasn't actually here, although the company assures us that there will be a prototype for us to drive soon.

And Lotus was the only brand that did justice to the "sexy" part of the show's title, with the stunning Bioethanol Elise. The company's now talking about lightweight electric sportscars, too - similar to the Tesla in America.

To get into the spirit of all this greenery I drove here from London in the Focus ECOnetic, which managed 52mpg on a normal, brisk, motorway journey. Not bad, but not brilliant: I'll see if I do better on my way home.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

Comments

lukemedway May 23, 2008 8:26 PM

Well when Ford can fit the ST with an ECOnetic powerplant that can deliver the same performance for less fuel consumption... I will be first on their customer list!

Quattro369 May 25, 2008 9:33 PM

The 1.6TDCi ECOnectic reduces CO2 to 115g/km from the 119g/km of the standard car. - Hardly seems worth the effort!

JJBoxster May 26, 2008 8:41 PM

AutoCar went to a green show staged in a greenhouse, saw very little green and came back greenless basically!

The car you went in, maybe a BMW 335i, Range Rover Sport or Bugatti Veyron, is already green. Very green. They create minimal pollution and do not impact the Earth. You do not need to visit a green show to be 'more green'. Green in harmony.

lukemedway May 26, 2008 11:02 PM

The article says he went in the new Focus... But yeah the green issue isn't a problem, but fuel supply and demand is and since we rely utterly on the production of crude, we're all slaves to the industry.

I think it's good that people are trying to find alternatives even if it is in the name of being environmentally friendly (when really once you do the sums, it isn't),  because at the end of the day consumers will finally have a choice, oil will have a competitor which will ultimately drive down the price of our energy.

As far as Co2 emissions are concerned, this fraudulant misconception that it's harmful to the environment needs to be cleared up scientifically once and for all and so does taxation of it... Why should we be taxed on something that is still under scientific debate and not regarded within the scientific community as a 100% fact? Why are we paying this?

martinj June 2, 2008 4:52 AM

Why do people still think saving 4g/km will be enough to outweigh the carbon cost of manufacturing the car? If they don't actually plan on making all Focuses/Foci ECOnetic, Ford's making a pretty pointless claim there anyway.

I don't much like the trend of manufacturers all trying to undercut the "congestion" charge rather than increasing efficiency (fuel economy) to battle long-term running costs. It really shows how much more they care about political fads and profits than making any real difference or improvements.

JJ, you seem to be developing a habit of not actually reading any details of the articles.

NiallOswald June 4, 2008 6:10 PM

Martinj - CO2 per km is essentially the inverse of MPG. The amount of CO2 generated depends on the amount of fuel burned - if the cars you're comparing are all running on the same fuel (i.e. petrol or diesel) then lower CO2 means higher MPG and vice-versa.

Car makers have been producing models to dodge tax bands for years, it's nothing new. Look up the E30 BMW 320is for example - sold in Italy where the M3's 2.3L engine would have been taxed more heavily. That was almost 20 years ago, I'm sure there are plenty of even older examples.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Cover 07 Jan

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>